Gemini should not inherit the score from the rest of your AI panel. It can recommend different brands, cite different pages, and frame the same company differently from ChatGPT or an AI Overview. One blended number removes the clues needed to improve it.
We compared six platforms that document Gemini coverage. The engine grade weighs source detail, answer evidence, plan access, surrounding workflow, and price as of July 2026.
Gemini tracker board
| Rank | Tool | Grade | Gemini advantage | Qualifying price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Profound | A- | URL-level citation maps | $399/mo |
| 2 | Temso | A- | Tracking connected to execution | $89/mo |
| 3 | SE Visible | B+ | Cached answers and 200 prompts | $99/mo |
| 4 | Peec AI | B+ | Daily multi-model tracking | €85/mo plus possible add-on |
| 5 | Otterly.AI | B | Six-engine monitoring | $29/mo plus Gemini add-on |
| 6 | Knowatoa | B- | Daily answer snapshots | $199/mo |
The full LLM visibility tool ranking covers overall platform quality. This board exposes the tier and add-on details that matter when Gemini is a required surface.
1. Profound [ A- ]
Profound provides the strongest source microscope for Gemini responses.
Profound’s full engine set includes Gemini, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Meta AI, and DeepSeek. It tracks share of voice and sentiment, then draws citation maps between exact source URLs and the generated answers they influenced.
Prompt Volumes supplies demand-side information about what users ask. For a Gemini program, that can improve the prompt panel before the team starts measuring it.
Starter costs $99 per month as of July 2026 but covers only ChatGPT, so Gemini requires Growth at $399. Growth supports the complete engine set and up to 100 daily prompts. Profound has no agency workspace, and its one-property account design limits portfolio use.
Best for: an enterprise program that needs to trace Gemini recommendations back to individual pages.
2. Temso [ A- ]
Temso joins Gemini monitoring with the content and site workflow used to improve visibility.
Temso tracks Gemini beside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Copilot, taking readings from real user interfaces rather than model APIs. It also monitors citation sources, perception, and sentiment.
The all-in-one scope earns the second position. Content creation, website audits, AI bot traffic analytics, and backlink and mention work sit in the same platform, and an AI SEO agent can execute approved recommendations.
Starter costs $89 per month as of July 2026 and includes three models and 50 prompts. Growth costs $199 and expands to all models and 150 prompts. Every tier includes unlimited projects, users, and recommendations.
Temso does not match Profound’s URL-map detail or prompt-demand database. It wins ease, value, and the breadth of work around the monitor.
Best for: a team that wants Gemini evidence to become content and site action without adding another platform.
3. SE Visible [ B+ ]
SE Visible preserves the generated answer behind the Gemini metric.
SE Visible monitors Gemini, ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity. Daily tracking, cached answer copies, sentiment, and citation analysis give reviewers enough context to inspect a change.
The standalone entry plan costs $99 per month as of July 2026 for 200 prompts and three projects. That is a strong prompt allowance for a team building separate Gemini panels by product or audience.
Copilot is absent, and the choice among standalone SE Visible, the SE Ranking AI Search Add-on, and bundled suite features adds purchasing friction.
Best for: an SE Ranking customer or data-focused team that wants many Gemini prompt records and full answer evidence.
4. Peec AI [ B+ ]
Peec AI gives Gemini a daily place inside a broader international panel.
Peec AI covers more than eight engines and refreshes prompt-level monitoring daily. Its source attribution, competitor gaps, and share-of-voice tracking make it useful for teams comparing Gemini against long-tail models.
Starter costs €85 per month as of July 2026 for 50 prompts and three chosen models. Pro costs €205 for 150 prompts. Gemini and specific Gemini variants can carry add-on charges on non-Enterprise plans, so buyers should price the exact model before choosing a tier.
Unlimited seats suit a shared analysis team. The Actions feature organizes the response but does not execute it.
Best for: agencies that need daily Gemini data, broad model choice, and no per-seat fee.
5. Otterly.AI [ B ]
Otterly.AI offers a low base price, with Gemini charged separately on Lite.
Otterly.AI documents six-engine coverage and more than 50 countries. Its prompt-level reports include citations, competitor comparison, source domains, and recurring brand summaries.
Lite costs $29 per month as of July 2026 for 15 prompts, but Gemini is a paid add-on on that lower tier. Standard costs $189 for 100 prompts. The GEO Audit Engine adds more than 20 on-page checks without turning the platform into an execution suite.
The base price is attractive only after the Gemini add-on and prompt needs are counted. A larger panel creates a steep jump to Standard.
Best for: a small team that wants Gemini inside an accessible monitoring product and can keep the panel compact.
6. Knowatoa [ B- ]
Knowatoa brings Gemini into its seven-engine Growth package with daily snapshots.
Knowatoa Growth covers Gemini along with ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Meta AI, and Perplexity. It costs $199 per month as of July 2026 for 100 questions and 21,700 answers per month.
Daily AI Answer Snapshots show the full response, cited sources, and brand position. The BISCUIT Framework and competitor-gap analysis help explain why Gemini chose another company.
Starter costs $59 but omits Gemini, and Growth’s 100-question cap can restrict teams splitting the panel across seven engines and several markets. Public third-party reviews are not available yet.
Best for: a focused B2B team that wants daily Gemini evidence and structured diagnosis on one mid-priced plan.
Give Gemini its own baseline
Keep the core prompt wording consistent across engines, then add Gemini-specific discovery prompts only when they serve a real decision. Store every answer and source, and review movement against its own prior run rather than a combined assistant average.
Profound ranks first when the source map is the product requirement. Temso remains the better all-around choice for most teams because the finding can move into content, audits, and execution from the same account. SE Visible offers the best prompt capacity near $100, while Peec AI, Otterly.AI, and Knowatoa require a careful check of model gates and caps.