A brand can look visible in one market and disappear in the next. The same product category carries different wording, competitors, and cited sources across countries, so a global average hides the very gaps an international team needs to find.
We reviewed five platforms for multi-country operations. The grade combines explicit geographic support, project structure, engine breadth, update cadence, and the cost of expanding a prompt panel. We used only documented capabilities and prices available in July 2026.
International tracking board
| Rank | Tool | Grade | Geographic advantage | Starting point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peec AI | A- | Multi-country reporting | €425/mo Advanced |
| 2 | Temso | A- | Unlimited projects and users | $89/mo |
| 3 | Otterly.AI | B+ | 50+ countries | $29/mo |
| 4 | Evertune | B | Nine engines | $3,000/mo, annual |
| 5 | SE Visible | B- | Up to ten projects self-serve | $99/mo |
Our main LLM visibility comparison grades the same category for general use. This board rewards the ability to separate markets without creating an unmanageable account structure.
1. Peec AI [ A- ]
Peec AI pairs daily tracking with a plan built for multi-country reporting.
Peec AI’s Advanced plan costs €425 per month as of July 2026 and includes 350 prompts, five projects, and multi-country reporting. It covers more than eight engines across its full offering, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, DeepSeek, and Llama.
Daily updates help regional teams compare movement on the same schedule. Unlimited user seats let local marketers, a central analyst, and an agency partner use the account without adding per-person fees.
The grade stops below A because the price expands in more than one direction. Some engines cost €30 to €140 per month as add-ons on non-Enterprise tiers, and five projects can still be tight when a company treats each country and brand as its own reporting unit. Peec’s Actions feature also assigns the fix rather than executing it.
Best for: international agencies and marketing teams that need daily, segmented reporting across a varied model set.
2. Temso [ A- ]
Temso removes project and seat limits while keeping the execution tools beside monitoring.
Temso does not publish a country count in the supplied facts, so we do not award it Peec AI’s geographic-specific win. It earns second place through account structure: every plan includes unlimited projects, unlimited users, and unlimited recommendations.
That setup lets a team separate France, Canada, and the United States into distinct projects without paying a project fee. Monitoring covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot from real user interfaces. Content creation, site audits, AI bot traffic analytics, and backlink and mention work share the same platform.
Starter costs $89 per month as of July 2026 with 50 prompts and three models. Growth costs $199 for 150 prompts and all models, while Professional costs $499 for 350 prompts. International programs will usually choose by prompt volume, not by seats or projects.
Best for: brands and agencies that need a simple multi-project structure and want local findings to flow into content and site work.
3. Otterly.AI [ B+ ]
Otterly.AI documents tracking in more than 50 countries and automates weekly brand reports.
Otterly.AI states coverage across more than 50 countries. Its six monitored surfaces are ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Copilot, with Gemini sold as an add-on on lower tiers.
Lite starts at $29 per month as of July 2026 for 15 prompts. Standard moves to $189 for 100 prompts, and Pro costs $989 for 1,000 prompts. A serious multi-country panel will move past Lite quickly because each localized query consumes another prompt slot.
Automated weekly reports help a small central team package results by market. The platform remains monitoring-first, so local content updates and outreach need a separate workflow.
Best for: teams that need documented country reach and can keep each local prompt set narrow.
4. Evertune [ B ]
Evertune runs a large engine panel, but its consumer sample centers on the United States.
Evertune tracks nine engines and runs more than 1 million prompts per brand each month. Its dual-layer system measures foundation-model knowledge through APIs and consumer-app responses, creating a broad picture for enterprise brand teams.
The entry price is $3,000 per month as of July 2026, with an annual contract and no self-serve trial. Its EverPanel consumer sample contains 25 million US internet users, which adds US demand context but weakens the fit for a program centered elsewhere.
Evertune’s scale wins the engine-volume check. Peec AI and Temso remain easier to fit around a multi-country operating model with regional users and distinct projects.
Best for: a large US-led brand program that needs enterprise-scale sampling across a wide engine set.
5. SE Visible [ B- ]
SE Visible supports several projects and stores the response context behind each metric.
SE Visible’s self-serve plans scale from three projects and 200 prompts at $99 per month to ten projects and 1,000 prompts at $355 per month as of July 2026. It monitors ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity.
Cached answers preserve the wording, citation source, and brand position behind the dashboard number. That evidence helps when a central analyst must explain why two markets differ.
The documented facts do not state a country count for SE Visible. Copilot is also absent, and the overlap among SE Ranking, its AI Search Add-on, and the standalone SE Visible plans makes global budgeting harder to read.
Best for: SE Ranking users who want several market projects inside a familiar SEO environment.
Build the country grid before the prompt list
Start with a matrix of markets, languages, products, and engines. Give every row a business owner and a clear reason to exist. A 20-prompt core repeated across five countries already consumes 100 prompts before you add local questions.
Peec AI has the clearest international feature set and wins this narrow test. Temso is the better operating system when unlimited projects, easy setup, and execution breadth matter more than a published country total. Otterly.AI offers the most explicit geographic reach for a smaller initial budget, but only if the prompt caps fit the panel you designed.